Abstract

Extensive tests of two recent geopotential models (GEM 7 and 8) have been made with observations not used in the solutions. Several other recent models are also evaluated. These tests show the accuracy of the satellite derived model (GEM 7, with 400 coefficients) to be about 4.3 m (r.m.s.) with respect to the global geoid surface. The corresponding accuracy of the combined satellite and surface gravimetry model (GEM 8, with 706 coefficients) is found to be 3.9m (r.m.s.). These results include a calibration for the commission errors of the coefficients in the models and an estimate of the errors from omitted coefficients. For GEM 7, the formal precision (commission errors) of the solution gives 0.7 m for the geoid error which after calibration increases to 2.4 m. Independent observations used in this assessment include: 159 lumped coefficients from 35 resonant orbits of 1 and 9 through 15 revolutions per day, two sets of (8, 8) fields derived from optical-only and laser-only data, sets of zonal and resonant coefficients derived from largely independent sources and geoid undulations measured by satellite altimetry. In addition, the accuracy of GEM 7 has been judged by the gravimetry in GEM 8. The ratio of estimated commission to formal error in GEM 7 and 8 ranges from 2 to 5 in these tests.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.