Abstract

Purpose:To evaluate sensitivity and specificity of digital retinal image reading in the diagnosis of referral-warranted retinopathy of prematurity (ROP).Methods:Infants referred to the ROP clinic underwent fundus examination through indirect ophthalmoscopy. Fundus photographs were acquired using RetCam (shuttle 2; Clarity medical systems, Pleasanton, CA, USA). Four retinal specialists who were blind to patients’ information reviewed the RetCam fundus photographs. By comparing the results of photographs’ readings with that of indirect ophthalmoscopy as the gold standard, the sensitivity and specificity of telescreening was determined.Results:A total of 147 treatment-naïve patients met the inclusion criteria and were enrolled in the study. Mean gestational age (GA) was 28.6 ± 2.0 weeks. Digital retinal imaging had sensitivity of 85% and specificity of 35% in detecting referral-warranted ROP in our study. Positive predictive value of digital photography was 80%, and negative predictive value was 43%.Conclusion:Digital photography for diagnosis of ROP may show good potential as a screening modality in developing countries. It can facilitate early diagnosis, prevent unnecessary referrals, and be implemented for investigational purpose. However, the overall study result did not provide evidence to propose digital photography as a substitute for indirect ophthalmoscopy in the diagnosis of ROP.

Highlights

  • 204 eyes from 147 patients were diagnosed with PLUS disease and 221 eyes were referred for treatment including laser ablation, intravitreal bevacizumab injection, or surgery

  • Considering indirect ophthalmoscopy as the gold standard for Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) diagnosis, sensitivity and specificity of referral warranted cases and PLUS disease was calculated for each examiner and average value was calculated

  • We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of digital imaging in diagnosing referral‐warranted ROP

Read more

Summary

Introduction

It has significant limitations: need for ophthalmologists to travel to the NICUs, which is time consuming and costly; subjective documentation of clinical findings through hand drawing; and in controversial cases of PLUS disease, non‐availability.

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call