Abstract

The performance of current density functionals is analyzed in detail for the electric field gradients (EFG) of hydrogen chloride and copper chloride by comparison with ab initio methods and available experimental data. The range of density functionals applied shows good agreement with coupled cluster H and Cl field gradients for HCl, as has been demonstrated previously for other main-group element containing compounds. However, the performance of most density functionals is very poor for the Cu EFG in CuCl (EFG for Cu -0.44 a.u. at the coupled-cluster singles and doubles with perturbative triples [CCSD(T)] level, compared to, e.g., +0.54 a.u. at the B-LYP level). Only the “half-and-half” hybrid functionals give field gradients with the correct sign. The reason for the poor performance of the density functional theory is analyzed in detail comparing density functional with ab initio total electronic densities ρ(r). Due to the conservation of the number of particles, a change in the valence part of the electron density can lead to changes in the core part of the density. Errors in valence electronic properties like the dipole moment and in core properties like the Cu and Cl EFGs may therefore be connected. In fact the errors in both properties show a distinct linear relationship, indicating that if the dipole moment is correctly described by density functionals, the Cu and Cl EFGs may be accurate as well. Furthermore, at the atomic level, electric field gradients are described with reasonable accuracy by current density functionals as calculations for the Cu 2P excited state and the Cu2+ 2D ground state show. A comparison between the different density functionals shows that the incorrect behavior of the electronic density appears to be mainly due to defects in the exchange part of the functional.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.