Abstract

In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, many Governments are instituting mobile tracking technologies to perform rapid contact tracing. However, these technologies are only effective if the public is willing to use them, implying that their perceived public health benefits must outweigh personal concerns over privacy and security. The Australian federal government recently launched the 'COVIDSafe' app, designed to anonymously register nearby contacts. If a contact later identifies as infected with COVID-19, health department officials can rapidly followup with their registered contacts to stop the virus' spread. The current study assessed attitudes towards three tracking technologies (telecommunication network tracking, a government app, and Apple and Google's Bluetooth exposure notification system) in two representative samples of the Australian public prior to the launch of COVIDSafe. We compared these attitudes to usage of the COVIDSafe app after its launch in a further two representative samples of the Australian public. Using Bayesian methods, we find widespread acceptance for all tracking technologies, however, observe a large intention-behaviour gap between people's stated attitudes and actual uptake of the COVIDSafe app. We consider the policy implications of these results for Australia and the world at large.

Highlights

  • The COVID-19 pandemic caused by the severe acute respiratory coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) disease has changed how Australians live, work and socialise

  • We focus on the following COVID-19 tracking technologies: telecommunication network tracking (e.g., Taiwan’s electronic fence [18]), a Government smartphone app (e.g., Australia’s COVIDSafe [19]), and Apple and Google’s exposure notification (EN) Bluetooth system (e.g., Germany’s Corona Warn-App [20])

  • We present four survey samples collected during the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia between April 6th and June 23rd 2020

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The COVID-19 pandemic caused by the severe acute respiratory coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) disease has changed how Australians live, work and socialise. In the absence of a vaccine or treatment, behavioral measures such as restricting public gatherings and physical distancing [1], mask wearing [2], lockdown policies, and hand-washing [3] have been the only means available to slow the spread of the virus (Fig 1). The easing of restrictions and reduction of compliance preempted a ‘second wave’ of infections, shown in Fig 1 [4].

Objectives
Methods
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call