Abstract

Fracturing horizontal wells is an important technology that can make production from tight and shale formations economical. The fractured tight and shale formations are recognized by complex fracture networks around the primary hydraulic fractures. Microseismic mapping is a technique which can shed light on the activities happen around the main fractures which can direct us towards the extent of the fracture half-length and the secondary fracture networks in the stimulated reservoir volume (SRV). However, microseismic mapping does not necessarily indicate if the observed events can be directly related to the increased conductivities around the wellbore. There is rather a large uncertainty about the interpretation of the extent of effective (reopened) fracture network which can have a large impact on the performance of the flow simulations. In this paper, a quantitative workflow is attempted to model the discrete fracture networks using multiple-point geostatistical algorithms to account for the uncertainty in the interpretation of the microseismic events. Uncertainty in microseismic data interpretation is also included in the algorithm (in terms of secondary probability maps) to account for the variability in the extent of the discrete fracture network within the stimulated reservoir volume (SRV). A sensitivity study is performed to understand the effect of different parameters on the well flow performance given different fracture network models. The results show that the connectivity of the fracture networks generated by the MPS method in this study is rather poor. Consequently, the permeability of the natural fractures has a dominant effect on the flow performance. In fact, the poor connectivity of fracture network does not allow to observe the effect of porosity of natural fracture and the permeability of hydraulic fracture on the flow performance. This research restresses that the MPS algorithm is not a push-a-button method to always generate reliable realizations. This work provides a guideline to better screen the generated geostatistical realization.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call