Abstract

Previous researches show that buy (growth) companies conduct income increasing earnings management in order to meet forecasts and generate positive forecast Errors (FEs). This behavior however, is not inherent in sell (non-growth) companies. Using the aforementioned background, this research hypothesizes that since sell companies are pressured to avoid income increasing earnings management, they are capable, and in fact more inclined, to pursue income decreasing Forecast Management (FM) with the purpose of generating positive FEs. Using a sample of 6553 firm-years of companies that are listed in the NYSE between the years 2005–2010, the study determines that sell companies conduct income decreasing FM to generate positive FEs. However, the frequency of positive FEs of sell companies does not exceed that of buy companies. Using the efficiency perspective, the study suggests that even though buy and sell companies have immense motivation in avoiding negative FEs, they exploit different but efficient strategies, respectively, in order to meet forecasts. Furthermore, the findings illuminated the complexities behind informative and opportunistic forecasts that falls under the efficiency versus opportunistic theories in literature.

Highlights

  • Dutta and Gigler [2] suggest that companies have strong incentives to avoid negative Forecast Errors (FEs) or/and generate positive FEs

  • This study aims to examine the effects of the analysts’ recommendations as buy or sell recommendations, representing the growth and non-growth companies on the managers’ decisions towards forecasts management

  • Burgstahler and Eames [36] argued that the benefit of Forecast Management (FM) to a firm may increase the amount of FM, i.e. there may be incremental benefits to beating rather than just meeting the analysts’ forecasts

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Dutta and Gigler [2] suggest that companies have strong incentives to avoid negative Forecast Errors (FEs) or/and generate positive FEs. Abarbanell and Leahvy [1] indicated that the companies’ ability to manipulate earning influences the extent of earnings management They argue that the companies with higher growth rates are more capable in manipulating profits. Abarbanell and Leahvy [1] assume that the companies that are recommended by analysts to be bought (hereafter buy companies) are classified as growth type companies that will enjoy high profitability.

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.