The 3Ds – Discussion, diagnosis and direction: Elements for effective obesity care by healthcare professionals

Abstract

Listen

Translate article

BackgroundThe care of people with obesity is often suboptimal due to both physician and patient perceptions about obesity itself and clinical barriers. Using data from the ACTION-IO study, we aimed to identify factors that might improve the quality of obesity care through adoption of the 3D approach (Discussion, Diagnosis and Direction [follow-up]) by healthcare professionals (HCPs). MethodsAn online survey was completed by HCPs in 11 countries. Exploratory beta regression analyses identified independent variables associated with each component of the 3D approach. ResultsData from 2,331 HCPs were included in the statistical models. HCPs were significantly more likely to initiate weight discussions and inform patients of obesity diagnoses, respectively, if (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]): they recorded an obesity diagnosis in their patient's medical notes (1.59, [1.43–1.76] and 2.16 [1.94–2.40], respectively); and they were comfortable discussing weight with their patients (1.53 [1.39–1.69] and 1.15 [1.04–1.27]). HCPs who reported feeling motivated to help their patients lose weight were also more likely to initiate discussions (1.36 [1.21–1.53]) and schedule follow-up appointments (1.21 [1.06–1.38]). By contrast, HCPs who lacked advanced formal training in obesity management were less likely to inform patients of obesity diagnoses (0.83 [0.74–0.92]) or schedule follow-up appointments (0.69 [0.62–0.78]). ConclusionSpecific actions that could improve obesity care through the 3D approach include: encouraging HCPs to record an obesity diagnosis; providing tools to help HCPs feel more comfortable initiating weight discussions; and provision of training in obesity management. Clinical trial registrationNCT03584191.