Abstract

BackgroundOnly multifaceted hospital wide interventions have been successful in achieving sustained improvements in hand hygiene (HH) compliance.Methodology/Principal FindingsPre-post intervention study of HH performance at baseline (October 2007– December 2009) and during intervention, which included two phases. Phase 1 (2010) included multimodal WHO approach. Phase 2 (2011) added Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI) tools and was based on: a) Increase of alcohol hand rub (AHR) solution placement (from 0.57 dispensers/bed to 1.56); b) Increase in frequency of audits (three days every three weeks: “3/3 strategy”); c) Implementation of a standardized register form of HH corrective actions; d) Statistical Process Control (SPC) as time series analysis methodology through appropriate control charts. During the intervention period we performed 819 scheduled direct observation audits which provided data from 11,714 HH opportunities. The most remarkable findings were: a) significant improvements in HH compliance with respect to baseline (25% mean increase); b) sustained high level (82%) of HH compliance during intervention; c) significant increase in AHRs consumption over time; c) significant decrease in the rate of healthcare-acquired MRSA; d) small but significant improvements in HH compliance when comparing phase 2 to phase 1 [79.5% (95% CI: 78.2–80.7) vs 84.6% (95% CI:83.8–85.4), p<0.05]; e) successful use of control charts to identify significant negative and positive deviations (special causes) related to the HH compliance process over time (“positive”: 90.1% as highest HH compliance coinciding with the “World hygiene day”; and “negative”:73.7% as lowest HH compliance coinciding with a statutory lay-off proceeding).Conclusions/SignificanceCQI tools may be a key addition to WHO strategy to maintain a good HH performance over time. In addition, SPC has shown to be a powerful methodology to detect special causes in HH performance (positive and negative) and to help establishing adequate feedback to healthcare workers.

Highlights

  • Healthcare-associated infections (HAI) occur in 5–10% of hospitalized patients during their hospital stay [1]

  • The importance of hand hygiene (HH) in preventing HAIs is well sustained in evidence-base models [4,5], and prospective studies [6,7,8,9,10]; HH promotion is included in all bundle interventions aimed to reduce HAIs [1]

  • The hand hygiene monitor team (HHMT) dedicated an equivalent of 0.19 full working time/year

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Healthcare-associated infections (HAI) occur in 5–10% of hospitalized patients during their hospital stay [1]. The importance of hand hygiene (HH) in preventing HAIs is well sustained in evidence-base models [4,5], and prospective studies [6,7,8,9,10]; HH promotion is included in all bundle interventions aimed to reduce HAIs [1]. Adherence to appropriate HH practices is considered one of the cornerstones for HAI prevention [3,4,11], following HH guidelines in many healthcare facilities remains suboptimal [12], with median compliance rates below 50% reflecting a worrying gap between evidence and real practice. Multifaceted hospital wide interventions have been successful in achieving sustained improvements in hand hygiene (HH) compliance

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call