Abstract

With over 100 million people without access to sewage collection and treatment and over 35 million lacking access to piped drinking water, the water and sanitation services (WSS) sector in Brazil ranks last among all the infrastructure sectors. Despite previous efforts to reach universal coverage, the gap remains wide. In order to reduce this gap, the Brazilian Parliament approved the reform of the WSS sector in July 2020. This paper examines the state of the water and sanitation services in Brazil before 2020 as well as the potential effects of the recently approved reform. It demonstrates that the sector’s primary issues are the fragmented institutional arrangements and regulations, the low levels of investments by the public sector, including those made by State-owned water companies, and the barriers to entry for the private sector. The paper also discusses the new provisions included in the reform designed to remedy those issues. The authors believe that the reform has the potential to promote significant changes in the structure of the WSS towards providing a universal and equitable service in Brazil, but at a slower pace than the reformers anticipated.

Highlights

  • With over 100 million people without access to sewage collection and treatment and over 35 million lacking access to piped drinking water, the water and sanitation services (WSS) sector in Brazil ranks last among all the infrastructure sectors

  • This paper describes the current state of the WSS in Brazil, the new provisions brought about by the reform approved by the Parliament and the potential impact of the reform

  • Despite advances in recent decades, the water and sanitation services sector is the last major Brazilian infrastructure sector that has not been universalized in Brazil, unlike other sectors such as energy and telecommunications

Read more

Summary

Private Company

About the quality of the services provided, and they do not allocate the risks between the parties Because these State-owned companies are larger institutions than most municipalities they serve, even when the quality of the service is very poor, it is difficult for municipalities to take back the provision of the services. This is because of the asymmetry of information on the value of the assets built by the State-owned companies.

Urban Population Supplied
Identifying areas
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call