Abstract

This contribution investigates whether the 2014 White Paper on EU Merger Control adds value to the existing debate surrounding non-controlling minority shareholdings. In this respect, it evaluates whether the 2013 minority shareholdings consultation rationale is consistently followed through. This contribution analyses three important novelties put forward by the White Paper: the principles guiding the reform (plugging the enforcement/regulatory gap, observing the reform's proportionality, and its consistency with existing control systems), defining the standards that the transactions prone to investigation must meet (“competitively significant links”), and narrowing down the choices for intervention methods (“targeted transparency system”). The contribution concludes that while the White Paper's proposed amendments generally fit the reform principles scheme, certain problems may still be identified, especially in relation to the necessity of a waiting period for minority shareholdings, and to the benefits and drawbacks of the possibility to intervene ex post on such transactions.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.