Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic performances of Tl-201 single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and dobutamine stress cine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for predicting functional recovery of regional myocardial contraction in patients after myocardial infarction. Twenty patients underwent Tl-201 SPECT and MRI 3-4 weeks after onset of myocardial infarction. Cine MR images were acquired in the resting state and during dobutamine stress. Tl-201 uptake and systolic wall thickening (SWT) on cine MRI were analyzed on short-axis images by using a 14-segment model. Follow-up cine MR images were obtained 187.1+/-33.5 days after onset. The averaged Tl-201 uptake in 54 segments with impaired SWT was 47%+/-20%, being significantly lower than that in 226 segments with preserved SWT (75%+/-18%; p<0.0001). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of dobutamine MRI and Tl-201 SPECT for predicting preserved SWT after 6 months were 89% vs. 80%, not significant (NS); 89% vs. 72%, p<0.01; and 89% vs. 79%, NS, respectively. In the anterior wall and apex, the sensitivity and specificity of SPECT were not significantly different from those of MRI. In the inferior wall and posterolateral wall, however, the specificity of SPECT was substantially lower than that of MRI (53% vs. 88%, p<0.001), resulting in significantly lower accuracy (75% vs. 90%, p<0.01). Both SPECT and dobutamine MRI showed excellent sensitivity for predicting myocardial viability in all left ventricular segments. Decreased specificity of SPECT in the inferior and posterolateral segments resulted in lower overall specificity in comparison with dobutamine MRI.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.