TH3.4 Perineal reconstruction following standard and extralevator abdominoperineal excision: results of a national practice questionnaire

Abstract

Abstract Aims Challenging perineal defects resulting from extralevator (ELAPE) and standard abdominoperineal excision (APE) have resulted in a growing multidisciplinary approach between colorectal and plastic surgery colleagues. Currently there is a paucity of evidence on best practice in this emerging field. This study aims to define and describe current national practice within the United Kingdom (UK) in perineal reconstruction following APE/ELAPE. Methods A national practice questionnaire was designed using ‘Google Forms' and circulated via email to 41 units across the UK performing perineal reconstruction following APE/ELAPE. Results Complete responses were received from 23 units (response rate 56%), representing 12 regions across the UK. All units had a dedicated APE/ELAPE service. 70% had a standardised approach to reconstruction, with the Inferior Gluteal Artery Perforator (IGAP) flap being the most common approach (n = 11). Significant variation was observed in the reconstructive approach with regards to flap choice and routine use of pelvic acellular dermal matrix or mesh. Similar differences were observed in the perceived importance of various surgical factors that guide the reconstructive decision making process. Conclusions Our national practice questionnaire responses report nationally well established local networks between colorectal and plastic surgeons. However, the variation in results reflects a lack of national consensus on the optimal reconstructive method after APE/ELAPE. Our study highlight the need for the development of collaborative evidence based national guidance on best practice.