Abstract
This article is concerned with the nature and ‘effectiveness’ of ‘explicitness’ in the signalling of relations in written discourses. I shall first examine what is meant by ‘explicitness’ and how explicitness may be linguistically realised, and shall consider whether and how different degrees of explicitness may render discourses more or less ‘effective’ for readers. Relations between features of discourses and inferential tendencies of readers can be clarified through empirical study. I present an instance of such research, carried out at the University of Botswana, concerning a type of contrast found quite widely in academic discourse. The research is in an applied linguistic perspective. It investigates problems of readers of English as a second language in identifying ‘Hypothetical—Real’ contrasts, which apparently conflict with widespread inferential tendencies on the part of these readers. This article describes studies of two textual variables: the ‘explicitness’ of contrastive signalling, and the ‘sequence’ in which contrasting Hypothetical and Real terms are introduced in texts. Findings show that subjects' responses were susceptible only to the ‘explicitness’ variable.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.