Abstract

e13044 Background: Although uncommon, materials used for dissection or to achieve hemostasis during neurosurgical procedures can cause an inflammatory reaction called textiloma that can mimic recurrent tumor. We report a case where advanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging suggested tumor, further mimicking previous reports of clinical and conventional MR patterns of tumor progression. Methods: A 61 year-old woman underwent an initial resection of a temporal lobe glioblastoma, followed by conventional chemoradiation, although maintenance temozolomide was stopped secondary to myelotoxicity. A nodular enhancing mass near to the surgical cavity was noted 10 months after diagnosis, leading to further evaluation with advanced MR imaging. Results: Brain MRI with advanced imaging studies including MR Spectroscopy (MRS), and perfusion imaging by dynamic contract-enhanced (DCE), and dynamic contrast susceptibility (DSC) were performed. There was progressive enlargement of an enhancing nodule in the wall of the resection cavity. MRS demonstrated an elevated choline-to-creatine ratio (approximately 2:1), while the DSC imaging demonstrated a mild amount of leak with a corrected cerebral blood volume value of about 1.93, and negative enhancement integral value 1.67. DCE demonstrated mild vascularity and mild-to-moderate leak, with an elevated peak enhancement integral value of ~22%. These imaging findings suggested recurrent GBM rather than post-treatment change. The mass was resected. Pathologic review showed both textiloma and radiation necrosis. Recurrent glioblastoma was not identified. Conclusions: Although very unusual, textiloma should be considered in the differential diagnosis of any growing mass lesion close to a surgical bed. Reparative granulomata show many of the hallmarks of cancer, including neovascularization, rapid growth and high lipid turnover, making it difficult to distinguish such lesions from true neoplasm, even with advanced imaging, without resorting to histology. Advanced imaging performs best in distinguishing conventional post-treatment change from tumor recurrence. This case highlights the major influence of surgical technique on postoperative imaging appearance.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.