Abstract

AbstractThe homoleptic tetrakis(ferrocenecarbonitrile) copper(I) complexes [Cu(N≡CFc)4]A [A = BF4 (3a), A = SO3CF3 (3b)] were succefully prepared by treatment of copper with the copper(II) salt [CuA2]·xH2O [A = BF4, x = 5 (1a); A = SO3CF3, x = 0 (1b)] in presence of cyanoferrocene (2). For 3a the tetrahedral arrangement of the four ferrocenecarbonitrile ligands at the copper atom was proven by single X‐ray diffraction studies. The FcC≡N units are weakly bonded to copper, which is reflected by a complete ligand exchange upon addition of MeC≡N forming [Cu(N≡CMe)4]BF4 (4). Electrochemical measurements of 3a revealed that all four ferrocenyl units are oxidized in a close potential range and the individual processes are not resolved in the cylic voltammogram. Due to the decrease of electron density at the ferrocenyl termini, the redox event is merely shifted to 456 mV (for comparison, free 2 has E°′ = 436 mV). For 3a intervalence charge transfer (IVCT) absorption between FeII/FeIII and/or CuI/FeIII could not be observed in the in situ UV/Vis/NIR spectra in any oxidation state. This alluded that no electronic interaction between the Fc/Fc+ termini over the –C≡N–CuI–N≡C– connectivities takes place. Nevertheless, upon oxidation a ligand‐to‐metal charge transfer (LMCT) band of the ferrocenium groups at 643 nm is visuable accompanied with a shift in the d‐d transition absorptions of the central iron atoms.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.