Abstract
Fisher's exact test is commonly used for testing the hypothesis of independence between the row and column variables in a $r \times c$ contingency table. It is a ``small-sample'' test since it is used when the sample size is not large enough for the Pearsonian chi-square test to be valid. Fisher's exact test conditions on both margins of a $2 \times 2$ table leading to a hypergeometric distribution of the cell counts under independence. Moreover, it is conservative in the sense that its actual significance level falls short of the nominal level. In this paper, we modify Fisher's exact test by lifting the restriction of fixed margins and allow the margins to be random. In doing so, we propose two new tests - a likelihood ratio test in a frequentist framework and a Bayes factor test in a Bayesian framework, both of which are based on a new multinomial distributional framework. We apply the three tests on data from the Worcester Heart Attack study and compare their power functions in assessing gender difference in the therapeutic management of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI).
Highlights
Analysis of contingency tables is an important area in the statistical analysis of data
We propose two new tests - a likelihood ratio test in a frequentist framework and a Bayes factor test in a Bayesian framework, both of which are based on a new multinomial distributional framework
We start with a motivating example taken from the Worcester Heart Attack study which deals with analyzing gender differences in receiving Lidocaine therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) patients older than 75 years who have a history of hypertension and stroke
Summary
Analysis of contingency tables is an important area in the statistical analysis of data. There are various procedures (or tests) of achieving the same but the one that is commonly used is the celebrated Pearsonian chi-square test formulated by the late Karl Pearson in 1900 This test compares the observed frequencies (of each cell of the table) to those expected under independence through a test statistic which can be shown to follow a chi-square distribution under the null hypothesis of independence. In many instances, where data is sparse, the above sample size restriction may not be satisfied and in that case the Pearsonian test statistic cannot be approximated by a chi-square distribution. In those cases, Fisher’s exact test is generally used
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: International Journal of Statistics and Probability
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.