Abstract
Collaboration can provide benefits to the individual and the group across a variety of contexts. Even in simple perceptual tasks, the aggregation of individuals' personal information can enable enhanced group decision-making. However, in certain circumstances such collaboration can worsen performance, or even expose an individual to exploitation in economic tasks, and therefore a balance needs to be struck between a collaborative and a more egocentric disposition. Neurohumoral agents such as oxytocin are known to promote collaborative behaviours in economic tasks, but whether there are opponent agents, and whether these might even affect information aggregation without an economic component, is unknown. Here, we show that an androgen hormone, testosterone, acts as such an agent. Testosterone causally disrupted collaborative decision-making in a perceptual decision task, markedly reducing performance benefit individuals accrued from collaboration while leaving individual decision-making ability unaffected. This effect emerged because testosterone engendered more egocentric choices, manifest in an overweighting of one's own relative to others' judgements during joint decision-making. Our findings show that the biological control of social behaviour is dynamically regulated not only by modulators promoting, but also by those diminishing a propensity to collaborate.
Highlights
Collaborative efforts, for example, when lions hunt in prides or human scientists toil together in the laboratory, can provide benefits to the individual and the wider social group [1,2,3]
Testosterone administration had no effect on individual decision-making
We found that testosterone caused a marked decrease in the individual performance benefit arising from collaboration (Scollective – Sindiv placebo 1.13 + s.d. 1.33, testosterone 0.54 + s.d. 1.02; paired t-test t33 1⁄4 3.3, p, 0.005)
Summary
Collaborative efforts, for example, when lions hunt in prides or human scientists toil together in the laboratory, can provide benefits to the individual and the wider social group [1,2,3]. These concerns motivate a focus here both on collaborative decision-making without an economic dimension, and on the need to dissociate testosterone’s potential effects on social and individual choice.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.