Testing the sensitivity of diagnosis-derived patterns in functional brain networks to symptom burden in a Norwegian youth sample.

Abstract

Aberrant brain network development represents a putative aetiological component in mental disorders, which typically emerge during childhood and adolescence. Previous studies have identified resting-state functional connectivity (RSFC) patterns reflecting psychopathology, but the generalisability to other samples and politico-cultural contexts has not been established. We investigated whether a previously identified cross-diagnostic case-control and autism spectrum disorder (ASD)-specific pattern of RSFC (discovery sample; aged 5-21 from New York City, USA; n = 1666) could be validated in a Norwegian convenience-based youth sample (validation sample; aged 9-25 from Oslo, Norway; n = 531). As a test of generalisability, we investigated if these diagnosis-derived RSFC patterns were sensitive to levels of symptom burden in both samples, based on an independent measure of symptom burden. Both the cross-diagnostic and ASD-specific RSFC pattern were validated across samples. Connectivity patterns were significantly associated with thematically appropriate symptom dimensions in the discovery sample. In the validation sample, the ASD-specific RSFC pattern showed a weak, inverse relationship with symptoms of conduct problems, hyperactivity and prosociality, while the cross-diagnostic pattern was not significantly linked to symptoms. Diagnosis-derived connectivity patterns in a developmental clinical US sample were validated in a convenience sample of Norwegian youth, however, they were not associated with mental health symptoms.