Testing the MEDALUS hillslope model

Abstract

In the Mediterranean environment formative erosional and runoff events are sporadic, intense and infrequent. They are difficult to study, their effects difficult to anticipate and the impact of vegetational and climatic change, whether natural or human-induced, difficult to predict. For these reasons, modelling has to augment the traditional approaches. In the Mediterranean Desertification and Land Use research programme, models have been developed to look at these problems at the hillslope (MEDALUS model) and large catchment scale (MEDRUSH model). Such models are only as good as their capacity to replicate, to an acceptable level, the magnitude, pattern in space and time and character of real world processes. These models can be tested by (a) examining their logical structure and performance against synthetic or control data (primary level) (b) evaluating their behaviour against published empirical spatial and temporal data (secondary level) and (3) by direct comparison with field test data (real world validation). The MEDALUS catena model comprises atmospheric, plant growth, overland flow and erosion, and subsurface water redistribution components involving a number of important novel features especially for dryland environments. It produces vegetation biomass and storm event runoff and sediment yield for different positions over a hillslope at different times. It is here tested against plot data for events and vegetation, soil moisture, runoff, erosion and slope armouring for annual series over several years. The model is found to perform moderately well for runoff and very well for sediment yield for event-based simulations. The results for longer simulations, tested at the secondary level, perform well in comparison with responses cited in the literature.