Abstract
Nut-cracking is often cited as one of the most complex behaviours observed in wild chimpanzees. However, the cognitive mechanisms behind its acquisition are still debated. The current null hypothesis is that the form of nut-cracking behaviour relies on variants of social learning, with some researchers arguing, more precisely, that copying variants of social learning mechanisms are necessary. However, to date, very few experiments have directly investigated the potentially sufficient role of individual learning in explaining the behavioural form of nut-cracking. Despite this, the available data provides some evidence for the spontaneous acquisition of nut-cracking by chimpanzees; later group acquisition was then found to be at least facilitated by (unspecified) variants of social learning. The latter findings are in line with both suggested hypotheses, i.e., that copying social learning is required and that other (non-copying) social learning mechanisms are at play. Here we present the first study which focused (initially) on the role of individual learning for the acquisition of the nut-cracking behavioural form in chimpanzees. We tested task-naïve chimpanzees (N = 13) with an extended baseline condition to examine whether the behaviour would emerge spontaneously. After the baseline condition (which was unsuccessful), we tested for the role of social learning by providing social information in a step-wise fashion, culminating in a full action demonstration of nut-cracking by a human demonstrator (this last condition made it possible for the observers to copy all actions underlying the behaviour). Despite the opportunities to individually and/or socially learn nut-cracking, none of the chimpanzees tested here cracked nuts using tools in any of the conditions in our study; thus, providing no conclusive evidence for either competing hypothesis. We conclude that this failure was the product of an interplay of factors, including behavioural conservatism and the existence of a potential sensitive learning period for nut-cracking in chimpanzees. The possibility remains that nut-cracking is a behaviour that chimpanzees can individually learn. However, this behaviour might only be acquired when chimpanzees are still inside their sensitive learning period, and when ecological and developmental conditions allow for it. The possibility remains that nut-cracking is an example of a culture dependent trait in non-human great apes. Recommendations for future research projects to address this question are considered.
Highlights
Humans have created a unique niche within the animal kingdom, one that relies on an ability to transfer knowledge between and within generations, allowing our species to inhabit almost every environment on the planet
We follow the terminology suggested recently by Neadle, Allritz & Tennie (2017), in which a cultural trait is any behaviour that is at least influenced by social learning. Within this definition of culture, the social learning mechanisms at play can be any of the many proposed variants. This minimal definition of culture allows for the identification of cultures that involve a range of social learning variants, including ones that rely on the copying of behaviour directly
Given the fact that wild chimpanzees engage in an extended process of acquisition before expressing nut-cracking (Matsuzawa et al, 2008), we suggest that future work considers applying an even longer study time than the one employed here
Summary
Humans have created a unique niche within the animal kingdom, one that (most likely) relies on an ability to transfer knowledge between and within generations, allowing our species to inhabit almost every environment on the planet. We follow the terminology suggested recently by Neadle, Allritz & Tennie (2017), in which a cultural trait is any behaviour that is at least influenced (including merely its frequency being facilitated or catalysed; Tennie, Call & Tomasello, 2010) by social learning. Within this definition of culture, the social learning mechanisms at play can be any of the many proposed variants (for an overview, see Whiten et al, 2004). For a more in-depth discussion of these, and other, terms we refer the reader to a glossary of terms in the supplementary materials provided
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.