Abstract

The social-categorization framework views the salience of personal and social identity as functionally antagonistic such that activation of one entails muting the other. Identity fusion theory, in contrast, suggests that when a group connection is strong the personal and social identities fuse such that activation of one activates the other and they synergistically influence behavior (e.g. fighting and dying for the group). We reasoned that such synergy should yield a reciprocal (not antagonistic) promotion of group-serving and individual-serving goals whereby fusion promotes willingness to sacrifice the self for the group and sacrifice the group for the self. Two studies yield evidence consistent with fusion theory in terms of a reciprocal sacrifice of self and group via fighting but not dying.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.