Testing the Habituation-Based Model of Exposures for Child and Adolescent Anxiety

Abstract

Exposure has been identified as key to effective treatment of youth anxiety. However, the precise theoretical mechanisms of exposure are a matter of debate. Emotional processing theory emphasizes the need for fear activation during exposure and its habituation both within and across exposures. Despite the popularity of the theory to explain exposure, it has not been tested with anxious youth. To determine whether emotional processing theory parameters predict anxiety severity, coping abilities, and global functioning after cognitive-behavioral treatment. The present study examined 72 youth (Mage = 10.50 years; 45% female; 87.5% non-Hispanic Caucasian) diagnosed with an anxiety disorder and who received family or individual CBT. Three exposure habituation variables—initial fear activation (peak anxiety), within-session habituation, and between-session habituation—were assessed using Subjective Units of Distress and examined as predictors of outcome at posttreatment and at 1-year follow-up. Outcomes were measured using the Coping Questionnaire, Multidimensional Anxiety Scale for Children, Revised Children’s Manifest Anxiety Scale, Children’s Global Assessment Scale, and clinician severity ratings on the Anxiety Disorder Interview Schedule. Emotional processing theory variables did not predict any anxiety outcomes at posttreatment or follow-up with one exception: Initial fear activation predicted less anxiety at follow-up among youth without GAD. In addition, within- and between-session habituation were not associated with one another. Between-session habituation was not associated with initial fear activation. These findings suggest a limited role of habituation within cognitive-behavioral therapy for anxiety in youth. An alternative to emotional processing theory, inhibitory learning theory, is discussed.