Abstract
Previous cross-national studies on dependency and economic growth in less developed countries (LDCs) seldom compare the impacts of different kinds of dependency. Their focus on economic growth also overlooks the fact that growth, per se, does not necessarily benefit the masses. An alternative measure of the absolute living standard of the masses, i.e., food intake, is examined in this paper. This study analyzes data from 73 LDCs. After comparing the effects of manufacturing growth and cereal production growth on food intake, this study supports the food-first hypothesis derived from Lappé and Collins' (1977) work, since it demonstrates that in most LDCs, even in middle-income LDCs, cereal production has a much stronger effect on food intake than does manufacturing growth.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.