Abstract

Global climate change is altering the timing of life history events for species living in seasonal environments. These shifts in phenology can lead to the disruption of interspecific relationships with implications for individual fitness. Predicting phenological change and its population level consequences can provide insights into population persistence. Achieving this is challenging for labile traits as current structured population models do not explicitly distinguish between the roles of phenotypic plasticity and micro‐evolution, hindering realistic predictions of trait change. In this study we present the first empirical test of a new integral projection model (IPM) framework, which allows phenotypic plasticity and micro‐evolution to be teased apart by incorporating a quantitative genetic inheritance function. We parameterise this model for a population of wild great tits Parus major and test its predictive capabilities through K‐fold cross validation. We test the predictive accuracy of the quantitative genetic IPM in comparison to the standard IPM. We demonstrate that adding genetic inheritance rules maintains high accuracy of projections of phenological change, relative to the standard IPM. In addition, we find almost identical projections of population dynamics in this population for both IPMs, demonstrating that this model formulation allows researchers to investigate the contributions of phenotypic plasticity and micro‐evolution to trait change, without sacrificing predictive accuracy. Modelling in this way reveals that, under directional environmental change, both micro‐evolution and plasticity contribute to an advance of phenology, although the effect of plasticity is an order of magnitude higher than evolution. Despite this, synchrony between great tits and their caterpillar prey was reduced and population declines occurred. Our approach demonstrates that this model framework provides a promising avenue through which to explore the roles of phenotypic plasticity and evolution in trait changes and population dynamics.

Highlights

  • Rapid climate change is altering biological populations across the globe (IPCC 2007)

  • There is no difference in accuracy of mean hatch date prediction between the two integral projection model (IPM)

  • The same is true for population dynamics

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Rapid climate change is altering biological populations across the globe (IPCC 2007). Different species have different degrees of environmental sensitivity (adaptive plasticity) and plasticity (Cushing 1969, Durant et al 2007, Thackeray et al 2010), rates of spring advance have been highly variable (Parmesan and Yohe 2003, Menzel et al 2006, Both et al 2009). These uneven patterns of response have been hypothesised to lead to mismatches between interacting species, which rely on temporal synchrony between interspecific life history events (Cushing 1969, Durant et al 2007, Singer and Parmesan 2010, Reed et al 2013)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call