Abstract

Abstract. We used a single foraminifera enabled, holistic hydroclimate-to-sediment transient modelling approach to fundamentally evaluate the efficacy of discrete-depth individual foraminifera analysis (IFA) for reconstructing past sea surface temperature (SST) variability from deep-sea sediment archives, a method that has been used, amongst other applications, for reconstructing El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO). The computer model environment allows us to strictly control for variables such as SST, foraminifera species abundance response to SST, as well as depositional processes such as sediment accumulation rate (SAR) and bioturbation depth (BD) and subsequent laboratory processes such as sample size and machine error. Examining a number of best-case scenarios, we find that IFA-derived reconstructions of past SST variability are sensitive to all of the aforementioned variables. Running 100 ensembles for each scenario, we find that the influence of bioturbation upon IFA-derived SST reconstructions, combined with typical samples sizes employed in the field, produces noisy SST reconstructions with poor correlation to the original SST distribution in the water. This noise is especially apparent for values near the tails of the SST distribution, which is the distribution region of particular interest in the case of, e.g. ENSO. The noise is further increased in the case of increasing machine error, decreasing SAR and decreasing sample size. We also find poor agreement between ensembles, underscoring the need for replication studies in the field to confirm findings at particular sites and time periods. Furthermore, we show that a species abundance response to SST could in theory bias IFA-derived SST reconstructions, which can have consequences when comparing IFA-derived SST distributions from markedly different mean climate states. We provide a number of idealised simulations spanning a number of SAR, sample size, machine error and species abundance scenarios, which can help assist researchers in the field to determine under which conditions they could expect to retrieve significant results.

Highlights

  • 1.1 BackgroundOne of the most studied palaeoclimate signal carrier vessels within deep-sea sediment cores is the carbonate shells of planktonic foraminifera, which can record the conditions of the ambient water that the foraminifera lived in

  • Their short lifespan means that foraminifera microfossil populations retrieved from deep-sea sediment archives can, in principle, reflect past monthly sea surface temperature (SST) dynamics, which is key for reconstructing decadal scale climate processes, such as El Niño– Southern Oscillation (ENSO)

  • We find that the discrete-depth, downcore 1σ value reconstructed using individual foraminifera analysis (IFA) analysis for the simulated 10 cm kyr−1 scenarios varies greatly between all of the 100 ensemble runs in the case of IFA sample sizes typically used in the field, i.e. between 50 foraminifera (Figs. 3a–b; 4a–b) and 100 foraminifera (Figs. 3c–d; 4c–d), individual foraminifera being picked per centimetre

Read more

Summary

Introduction

1.1 BackgroundOne of the most studied palaeoclimate signal carrier vessels within deep-sea sediment cores is the carbonate shells of planktonic foraminifera (microscopic, single-celled organisms), which can record the conditions of the ambient water that the foraminifera lived in. Metcalfe: Bioturbation and species abundance effects upon IFA single foraminifera shells sizes typically found in planktonic populations (Oba and Uomonoto, 1989; Spero and Williams, 1990), which has encouraged researchers to carry out a method commonly referred to as individual foraminifera analysis (IFA) to reconstruct SST variability associated with, e.g. ENSO (Koutavas et al, 2006; Leduc et al, 2009) This method can, in principle, allow for the extraction of a range of monthly SST values from a given interval of a deep-sea sediment archive (i.e. 1 cm discrete depths from a given sediment core). An SST distribution can be inferred and used to indicate past SST variability

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call