Abstract

The rapid global plant diversity and productivity loss has resulted in ecosystem functional degeneration in recent decades, and the relationship between plant diversity and productivity is a pressing issue around the world. Here, we sampled six plant communities that have not been grazed for 20 years, i.e., Agropyron mongolicum, Stipa bungeana, Cynanchum komarovii, Glycyrrhiza uralensis, Sophora alopecuroides, Artemisia ordosica, located in a desertified steppe, northwestern China, and tested the relationship between plant diversity and productivity in this region. We found a positive linear relationship between AGB (above-ground biomass) and BGB (below-ground biomass), and the curves between plant diversity and AGB were unimodal (R2 = 0.4572, p < 0.05), indicating that plant productivity increased at a low level of diversity but decreased at a high level of diversity. However, there was no significant relationship between BGB and plant diversity (p > 0.05). Further, RDA (redundancy analysis) indicated that soil factors had a strong effect on plant diversity and productivity. Totally, GAMs (generalized additive models) showed that soil factors (especially total nitrogen TN, total carbon TC, soil microbial biomass nitrogen SMB-N, soil microbial biomass carbon SMB-C) explained more variation in plant diversity and productivity (78.24%), which can be regarded as the key factors driving plant diversity and productivity. Therefore, strategies aiming to increase plant productivity and protect plant diversity may concentrate on promoting soil factors (e.g., increasing TC, TN, SMB-N and SMB-C) and plant species, which can be regarded as an effective and simple strategy to stabilize ecosystems to mitigate aridity in desertified steppes in northwestern China.

Highlights

  • Grasslands are widely distributed around the world, which cover about a quarter of the surface of the Earth, playing a crucial role in the global C cycling (Loreau, Naeem & Inchausti, 2001; Cardinale, Srivastava & Duffy, 2006)

  • generalized additive models (GAMs) showed that soil factors explained more variation in plant diversity and productivity (78.24%)

  • TC, TN, SMB-C, and SMB-N can be regarded as the key factors driving plant diversity and productivity in desertified steppes in northwestern China

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Grasslands are widely distributed around the world, which cover about a quarter of the surface of the Earth, playing a crucial role in the global C (carbon) cycling (Loreau, Naeem & Inchausti, 2001; Cardinale, Srivastava & Duffy, 2006). Niche specialization, and spatial scales in different ecosystems, the relationship between plant diversity and productivity may be negative (Tilman, Knops & Wedin, 1997; Gillman & Wright, 2006), positive (Wang, Long & Ding, 2001; Yang, Rao & Hu, 2003), flat (non-significant) (Hooper, Bignell & Brown, 2000), U-shaped (Wang, Long & Ding, 2001; Bai, Wu & Clark, 2012), hump-shaped (Mittelbach, Steiner & Scheiner, 2001; Tilman, Reich & Isbell, 2012; Backes & Veen, 2013) for all kinds of grasslands around the world, and these multiple patterns between plant diversity and productivity exist due to different explanations, including the availability of resources and energy, disturbance, plant species pool, herbivory, the spatial heterogeneity, history of plant communities (Tilman & Downing, 1994; Cardinale, Wright & Cadotte, 2007; Sun, Cheng & Li, 2013)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call