Abstract

In high dimensional setting, some testing procedures of means usually require imposing sparsity conditions on the population mean vector and/or the covariance matrix underlying the observed data. However, this is rarely true in many scenarios in social science, biology, etc., where the variables are possibly highly correlated due to existence of common factors. In this paper, we assume that the correlated variables are generated from the approximate factor model. We then correct the common factors from the original data and based on the factor-corrected data we redo the test of means invented in Cai et al. (2013a,b) (CLX test for short). It turns out that, on one hand, the newly proposed testing procedure is more powerful than the CLX test based on the original data due to the increase of the signal to noise ratio, and on the other hand, we only need the sparsity condition on the covariance structure of the idiosyncratic error term which can be met more easily than that on the original data. The residual based adaptive thresholding estimator of the precision matrix of the idiosyncratic error term is proved to be accurate in terms of the L1 norm. Simulation studies justify our findings. A real data set is analyzed confirming the conclusions we obtained.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.