Abstract

Children admitted to the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) are at risk for pressure injury due to immobility and the challenge of positioning medical devices. However, a comprehensive instrument to assess pressure injury risk is still finite. This study aimed to test the validity and reliability of the Braden QD Scale. The design used was a Pearson correlation coefficients and Cronbach’s alpha (α). Fifty-one pediatric patients below age 18 who had been bedridden for at least 24 hours were engaged through a consecutive sampling method. The results showed assessments made by using the Braden QD Scale revealed that 88.2% of patients were at risk for a pressure injury. The validity test results of the Braden QD Scale ranged between 0.532 and 0.833. The reliability test results of the Braden QD Scale ranged between 0.756 and 0.834. The sensitivity value is 100%, specificity value is 40%. In general, the study finding suggests that the Braden QD Scale is a valid and reliable instrument for predicting pressure injury risk. Nurses may employ this tool to assess pressure injury risk in pediatric patients.

Highlights

  • Intensive Care Unit (PICU) are at risk for the nasogastric tube (NGT) in 11% of incipressure injury due to immobility and the dents, and the oxygen saturation probe in 6% challenge of positioning medical devices. of incidents.[6]

  • The results showed assessments l made by using the Braden QD Scale ia revealed that 88.2% of patients were at risk for a pressure injury

  • Children admitted to the intensive care unit So, a validity and reliability test became the The instrument used in this research to colare at risk for pressure ulcers

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Intensive Care Unit (PICU) are at risk for the nasogastric tube (NGT) in 11% of incipressure injury due to immobility and the dents, and the oxygen saturation probe in 6% challenge of positioning medical devices. of incidents.[6]. The results showed assessments l made by using the Braden QD Scale ia revealed that 88.2% of patients were at risk for a pressure injury.

Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.