Abstract

ABSTRACT Mobile air cleaners have been gaining popularity as potentially effective tools for improving indoor air quality. Usually, the efficacy of an air cleaner is quantified by determination of the clean air delivery rate (CADR) under strictly defined conditions within test chambers lacking furniture and featuring adequate and homogeneous mixing of the test aerosol. By contrast, real-world scenarios may considerably differ from these conditions, resulting in adverse consequences, as a less homogeneous distribution of the cleaned air may produce spatial differences in the CADR and lead to lower overall efficacy for the air cleaner. Therefore, in this study, the spatial variance of a mobile air purifier’s cleaning efficacy across several positions in a furnished and in-use office room was investigated for four different scenarios, in each of which the air cleaner was placed in a different position inside the room. Ambient outdoor air was supplied as target aerosol by opening a window prior to the measurements, and the local CADR was calculated based on the decay rate of the lung-deposited surface area (LDSA) concentration. It was found that the relative decay of the LDSA concentration was almost identical for all of the measuring points throughout the room, hinting at a homogeneous distribution of the cleaned air. Varying the position of the air cleaner in the room resulted in only minor differences, except when the device was placed in an intentionally unfavourable location under a desk, which significantly reduced the cleaning efficacy. Despite the high spatial homogeneity, the CADR in the office room was significantly lower than the one determined according to the Chinese standard GB/T 18801-2015 in a standardized test chamber, which is presumably mainly attributable to the differing size distributions of the realistic and the standard test aerosol.

Highlights

  • Rising Importance of Air Cleaning Devices Negative health effects of particulate matter (PM) have been shown by numerous epidemiologic and toxicological studies (e.g., Dockery et al, 1993; Anderson et al, 2012)

  • The clean air delivery rate (CADR) was determined by using the health relevant lung deposited surface area (LDSA) concentration and compared to the data obtained from measurements conducted according to the Chinese standard GB/T 18801-2015

  • The lung-deposited surface area (LDSA) concentration was measured at four points in the room, and the local CADR was calculated from the concentration decay when the air purifier was running

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Rising Importance of Air Cleaning Devices Negative health effects of particulate matter (PM) have been shown by numerous epidemiologic and toxicological studies (e.g., Dockery et al, 1993; Anderson et al, 2012). Two types of air cleaning devices can be used to reduce indoor air pollution: static heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) systems or portable air cleaners. Besides their sheer size, the main difference between the approaches is that HVAC systems use single pass filtration, i.e., air from outside is filtered by an in-duct filter and released into the room to replace the polluted room air, whereas indoor air cleaners suck the air from the room and draw it through a filter before the cleaned air is released back into the room. Indoor air cleaners recirculate the air in the room. It has been shown by several studies during the past years that in-duct filters

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call