Abstract
AimsMonogenic diabetes is responsible for 1–5% of all cases of diabetes. A previous Australian study estimated a prevalence of 89 cases per million adults, or one in 280 people with diabetes. Approximately 80% of monogenic diabetes is misdiagnosed as type 1 or type 2 diabetes. Our aims were:1.To estimate the incidence of referral for genetic testing for monogenic diabetes at an Australian tertiary hospital.2.To estimate the proportion of individuals with confirmed monogenic diabetes out of those who are referred for genetic testing.3.To investigate the clinical, biochemical and genetic characteristics of patients with confirmed monogenic diabetes in an Australian population. MethodsWe conducted a retrospective audit of patients referred to the genetics service at Austin Health for testing for monogenic diabetes from August 2018 to January 2021, inclusive. We collected pre-existing clinical, biochemical and genetic data from electronic medical records from patients with both confirmed and suspected monogenic diabetes. ResultsOf approximately 2576 referrals to the diabetes clinic at Austin Health between December 2018 and January 2021, 46 individuals (1.8%, 95% CI 1.3–2.3%) were referred for genetic testing. Of the individuals referred for testing, 16 (35%, 95% CI 23-49%) declined testing and 3 (6.5%, 95% CI 2.2–18%) did not proceed with genetic testing due to their clinician identifying this as low-yield. Of the 27 individuals who were tested, ten individuals had a positive genetic test result (37%, 95% CI 22-58%) and 1 (2.1%, 95% CI 0.38–11%) had a variant of uncertain significance. GCK variants were the most common variant detected. ConclusionApproximately 0.39% (95% CI 0.21–0.71) of people seen in the diabetes clinics at a tertiary centre were diagnosed with monogenic diabetes over a period of 26 months.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.