Abstract

Background:Breast cancer is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Although mammography screening is available, there is an ongoing interest in improved early detection and prognosis. Herein, we have analysed a combination of serological biomarkers in a case–control cohort of sera taken before diagnosis.Methods:This nested case–control study within the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS) used serum samples from 239 women who subsequently developed breast cancer and 239 matched cancer-free controls. Sera were screened by ELISA for 9 candidate markers. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to examine associations with clinico-pathological features and between case controls in different time groups before diagnosis.Results:Significant associations with clinico-pathological features related to prognosis were found for several candidates (CA15-3, HSP90A and PAI-1). However, there were no consistent differences between cases and controls for any candidate in the lead up to diagnosis. Whilst combination models outperformed single markers, there was no increase in performance towards diagnosis.Conclusions:This study using unique pre-diagnosis samples shows that CA15-3, HSP90A and PAI-1 have potential as early prognostic markers and warrant further investigation. However, none of the candidates or combinations would be useful for screening.

Highlights

  • Breast cancer is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide

  • This study using unique pre-diagnosis samples shows that CA15-3, HSP90A and PAI-1 have potential as early prognostic markers and warrant further investigation

  • One weakness of the study is that more detailed information on the molecular sub-type of the tumours was not available, so future studies should address in more detail the possible effect of molecular sub-type on candidate biomarker levels, as recently reported for CA15-3 (Shao et al, 2015)

Read more

Summary

Methods

This nested case–control study within the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS) used serum samples from 239 women who subsequently developed breast cancer and 239 matched cancer-free controls. UKCTOCS participants gave informed written consent at recruitment for the use of their medical notes and serum in ethically approved secondary studies (UK North West Medical Research and Ethics Committee (MREC 00/8/34)). Ethical approval for this nested case–control study was granted by The Joint UCL/UCLH Committees on the Ethics of Human Research (Committee A) REC ref 05/Q0505/57. There was no significant difference in time to spin (clotting time) or age between cases and controls

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call