Abstract

Abstract The study assessed the viability of the published Oklahoma Aging Forgiveness Model on women in custody using cross-sectional data collected from females, violent and non-violent, in custody in Oklahoma. The theoretical model led to a hierarchical regression of a measure of positive mental health (Positive Evaluation of Life) on a block of control variables (age, education, and crime type), a block consisting of items from the Duke Religiosity measure, and a final block utilizing forgiveness of self, others, and situation (Heartland Forgiveness Scale). Results from the complete sample, N=447, explained 36% of the variance in the outcome. Significant individual predictors included in the final model were crime type, religiosity, and forgiveness of self and situations. We split the sample on crime type and found that for the violent offenders (N=228), 39% of the variance in the outcome was explained; in addition to religiosity, all three assessments of forgiveness were significant predictors. For the non-violent offenders (N=209), 35% of the outcome’s variability was explained. Religiosity, forgiveness of self and situation were significant predictors for this sub-sample. Discussion will focus on the Oklahoma Aging Forgiveness Model and how it works similarly for men in custody (published) and for women in custody. Further, the discussion will focus on the significant role played both by religiosity and forgiveness for those in custody. Findings from this study and that of studies with men clearly demonstrate that religiosity and forgiveness are important aspects of a prisoner’s life.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call