Abstract
This text analyses Truth Commissions as a political mechanism engaging with two main questions: one, the central role of testimonies in providing both ethical and political legitimacy to truth commissions and information regarding the violation of human rights; two, the work of professionals from law and the social sciences in providing scientific legitimacy and in their position as ‘privileged’ witnesses of the truth-telling process. Throughout the analysis of a specific case —the Peruvian Truth and Reconciliation Commission— I discuss the possibilities of scientific knowledge to produce a more complete understanding of “the violence” and the need to question certain interpretative assumptions regarding the political agency of certain populations, in this case, of the Andean rural communities.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
