Abstract

Lymphatic filariasis caused by the nematode Wuchereria Bancrofti is a major public health and socioeconomic problem in tropical and sub-tropical countries. The clinical manifestations of filariasis depend upon the stage in the course of infection in the human host and the worm load.It is a rarity to document filarial worms in histopathology from the testes. We present a case of atypical manifestation of urogenital filariasis where the patient had presented to us with unrelated complaints leading to a diagnostic dilemma. INTRODUCTION Lymphatic filariasis caused by the nematode Wuchereria Bancrofti is a major public health and socioeconomic problem in tropical and sub-tropical countries. It is estimated that close to 120 million people are affected in at least 80 countries throughout the tropics and subtropics. The clinical manifestations of filariasis depend on the stage in the course of infection in the human host and the worm load. The urogenital manifestations of filariasis can be of many types. We present a case of atypical manifestation of urogenital filariais leading to a diagnostic dilemma. CASE REPORT A 27-year-old patient presented with complaints of pain in the right scrotum for 3 months. On examination there was evidence of a nodule in the right cord structure. A similar hard nodule was palpable in the lower pole of the right testicle. There was no evidence of acute inflammation. There was no lymphadenopathy. The rest of the genital examination and abdominal examination was unremarkable. The patient underwent further evaluation with ultrasonography of the scrotum and inguinal region. There was a hypoechoic lesion with a speck of calcification in the lower pole of the right testis and a similar hypoechoic lesion in the right cord. There was poor vascularity in the lesion. Figure 1: Hypoechoic lesion in the right cord. Figure 2: Hypoechoic lesion in the lower pole of the right testis. A speck of calcification is visible in the centre of the lesion. There was an associated finding of a small aortocaval lymph node. In view of the above findings a possibility of testicular neoplasm was considered. Testicular tumor markers were within normal range. The patient underwent right inguinal exploration with testicular biopsy of the mass lesion and biopsy of the cord lesion using the Chevasu’s technique. The tissues were sent for frozen section. They were reported as foreign body granulomas. The patient had an uneventful recovery. Final histopathology was reported as microfilarial granulomas in the testis as well as the cord lesion. The patient was started on diethylcarbamazine 100mg for 6 weeks. Figure 3. Microfilaria seen in the testis. DISCUSSION The clinical manifestations of filariasis depend upon the stage of infection viz:

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call