Abstract

In the framework of alternative metric gravity theories, it has been shown by several authors that a generic Lagrangian depending on the Riemann tensor describes a theory with 8 degrees of freedom (which reduce to 3 for f(R) Lagrangians depending only on the curvature scalar). This result is often related to a reformulation of the fourth-order equations for the metric into a set of second-order equations for a multiplet of fields, including – besides the metric – a massive scalar field and a massive spin-2 field (the latter being usually regarded as a ghost): this is commonly assumed to represent the particle spectrum of the theory. In this article we investigate an issue which does not seem to have been addressed so far: in ordinary general-relativistic field theories, all fundamental fields (i.e. fields with definite spin and mass) reduce to test fields in some appropriate limit of the model, where they cease to act as sources for the metric curvature. In this limit, each of the fundamental fields can be excited from its ground state independently from the others (which does not happen, instead, as long as the fields are coupled through the gravitational interaction). We thus address the following question: does higher-derivative gravity admit a test-field limit for its fundamental fields? It is easy to show that for a generic f(R) theory (carrying 3 d.o.f.) the test-field limit does exist; then, we consider the case of Lagrangians depending on the full Ricci tensor, relying on a previous analysis published several years ago. We show that, already for a quadratic Lagrangian, the constraint binding together the scalar field and the massive spin-2 field does not disappear in the limit where they should be expected to act as test fields. A proper test-field limit exists only for a particular choice of the coefficients in the Lagrangian, which cause the scalar field to disappear (so that the resulting model has only 7 d.o.f.). We finally consider the possible addition of an arbitrary function of the quadratic invariant of the Weyl tensor, C^{alpha }{}_{beta mu nu }C_{alpha }{}^{beta mu nu }, showing that the appearance of the Weyl tensor does not add physical degrees of freedom (in accordance to the known results for Lagrangians depending on the full Riemann tensor) and the resulting model with 8 d.o.f. still lacks a proper test-field limit: the differential constraints between the fundamental fields do not cancel out when gravitational interaction is suppressed. We argue that the lack of a test-field limit for the dynamics of the fundamental fields may constitute a serious drawback of the full 8 d.o.f. higher-order gravity models, which is not encountered in the restricted 7 d.o.f. or 3 d.o.f. cases.

Highlights

  • Alternative theories of gravity have appeared soon after the advent of general relativity, the first of them was Weyl’s theory (1919) and since they have been copiously created.This phenomenon on one hand resembles the situation in other branches of physics, for example particle physics, but on the other is very different

  • We consider the possible addition of an arbitrary function of the quadratic invariant of the Weyl tensor, CαβμνCαβμν, showing that the appearance of the Weyl tensor does not add a e-mail: guido.magnano@unito.it physical degrees of freedom and the resulting model with 8 d.o.f. still lacks a proper test-field limit: the differential constraints between the fundamental fields do not cancel out when gravitational interaction is suppressed

  • We have merely shown that the the original Lagrangian L, which depends in a nonlinear way on the kinetic energy K is equivalent to a Lagrangian L H which is quadratic in the velocity components, but is written in an extended configuration space Q×R: the number of degrees of freedom is unchanged because all solutions in T (Q ×R) entirely lie on the submanifold defined by the equations p = f (K ) and p = f (K )K, which has the same dimension as T Q

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Alternative theories of gravity have appeared soon after the advent of general relativity, the first of them was Weyl’s theory (1919) and since they have been copiously created. The two sets of equations for L H are equivalent to fourth order Lagrange equations for the original L, showing that this generalization of a Legendre transformation makes sense It raises the problem: in the standard Hamiltonian formalism the canonical momenta are derivatives of a Lagrangian with respect to time derivatives of dynamical variables and carry independent degrees of freedom. For this Lagrangian it is not easy to find out constraints following from the field equations and in order to determine the number of DOF one first applies a version of this canonical formalism to decompose the unifying metric into a doublet comprising the metric and a scalar; this system has three DOF This system is dynamically consistent showing that no DOF have been lost due to the appropriate generalized Legendre transformation.

Lagrangian quadratically depending on R and the Ricci tensor
Tensorial momentum conjugate to the Weyl tensor
A scalar momentum conjugate to the Weyl tensor
The tensorial momentum in the case where the Ricci tensor is absent
Summary and conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call