Abstract

The CEFR is currently being used globally as a guiding document for specifying the standards of language learning, teaching, and assessment. The university wherein this study takes place, assumes that its internally produced English language tests are CEFR-related because they are based on textbooks which claim affinity with the CEFR. This study investigates the validity of this assumption. The literature review suggests a wealth of studies which link a specific test or exam to the CEFR based on the technical procedures laid out in the Manual for Relating Language Examinations to the CEFR (the Manual). This study has a different approach as it investigates whether the internally produced English language tests at a Saudi Arabian university are linked/related to the CEFR from the perspectives of the academic staff who are responsible for producing the English language tests at the university wherein this study is conducted. As such, this study is situated within an interpretative case study paradigm and uses a mixed method methodology for data collection and analysis. The study showed that all the research participants share the view that the English language exams which they develop are CEFR linked/related because they are based on the learning outcomes of textbooks which, according to the publisher, are CEFR linked. In addition, the contextual issues related to the implementation of the Manual and the CEFR are to be considered. The study presents implications and recommendations for the institution and for ELT publishers who claim that their ELT materials are CEFR linked.

Highlights

  • The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) was officially launched by the Council of Europe in 2001

  • This study, seeks to investigate whether the internal English language tests at the university wherein this study is conducted are linked and/or related to the CEFR from the perspectives of the academic staff members who are responsible for producing the English tests in the context addressed in this study

  • When TW3 was asked why he agreed that the textbooks are linked/related to the CEFR, he said that “...our textbooks are aligned with the CEFR scale because “...it is shown on the cover”

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) was officially launched by the Council of Europe in 2001. According to Coste (2007), one of the authors of the CEFR, the CEFR‟s influence on language assessment has been noteworthy, and the process involved in aligning language tests to the CEFR‟s Common Reference Levels has received more attention than any other aspect of the Framework (Council of Europe, 2011). This study is conducted in the Unified Science Track Program (USTRP) (formerly named as the Preparatory Year Program), at the English Language Center of a public university in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA). The USTP includes two English language courses which are conducted over two semesters These two English courses are named ENG101 and ENG102. The ENG102 course is offered in the summer semester for students who do not pass the ENG102 course in the second semester

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call