Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate the test-retest reliability of the Arden Grating Test (AGT), and to assess the extent to which any variance in AGT score on retest can be attributed to intra-subject and inter-tester differences. Twelve patients with various pathologies and whose contrast sensitivity covered a wide range were each tested twice by six testers. It was shown that variance attributable to testing by different clinicians accounted for approximately 25% of the total variance, and that the 95% confidence limits about any observed score were +/- 15 AGT units, which is about one quarter of the total dynamic range of the test. The large range of scores encompassed by the 95% confidence limits represents considerable unreliability, the consequence of which is a high misclassification rate, i.e. many false positives and false negatives, especially in the context of primary vision screening for which it was designed.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.