Abstract

Cortical reorganization in poststroke aphasia is not well understood. Few studies have investigated neural mechanisms underlying language recovery in severe aphasia patients, who are typically viewed as having a poor prognosis for language recovery. Although test-retest reliability is routinely demonstrated during collection of language data in single-subject aphasia research, this is rarely examined in fMRI studies investigating the underlying neural mechanisms in aphasia recovery.The purpose of this study was to acquire fMRI test-retest data examining semantic decisions both within and between two aphasia patients. Functional MRI was utilized to image individuals with chronic, moderate-severe nonfluent aphasia during nonverbal, yes/no button-box semantic judgments of iconic sentences presented in the Computer-assisted Visual Communication (C-ViC) program. We investigated the critical issue of intra-subject reliability by exploring similarities and differences in regions of activation during participants' performance of identical tasks twice on the same day. Each participant demonstrated high intra-subject reliability, with response decrements typical of task familiarity. Differences between participants included greater left hemisphere perilesional activation in the individual with better response to C-ViC training. This study provides fMRI reliability in chronic nonfluent aphasia, and adds to evidence supporting differences in individual cortical reorganization in aphasia recovery.

Highlights

  • Cortical reorganization underlying poststroke language recovery, while not well understood, is being actively studied with functional neuroimaging

  • This study addresses the issue of test-retest reliability in two individuals with chronic, moderate-to-severe nonfluent aphasia during acquisition of blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) functional magnetic resonance imaging

  • Percent accuracy was stable across test-retest in each participant

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Cortical reorganization underlying poststroke language recovery, while not well understood, is being actively studied with functional neuroimaging. Some studies link recovery with greater activation of right hemisphere (RH) language homologues [7,10,39]. These findings, have been challenged by stud-. Other studies suggest that activation of residual left hemisphere (LH) perilesional areas may be critical to better, or more efficient, language recovery [5,14,15,30,40]. Some reasons underlying the different conclusions offered by these studies include heterogeneity of subjects, task selection, and differences in methodologies used to acquire data [6].

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call