Abstract
Abstract Test-retest reliabilities and practice effect magnitudes are considered for nine computer-simulated tasks of everyday cognition and five traditional neuropsychological tests. Most measures showed significant practice effects upon reevaluation. Test-retest reliabilities of the computerized recall measures were equal to or superior to the traditional memory tests, but traditional measures of attention and concentration had superior reliabilities to the everyday tests. Test-retest reliabilities of everyday recognition memory tests were disappointing. Advantages of computerization of psychometric assessment and the need for multiple test forms are discussed.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
