Abstract

Animals often use public information for mate-choice decisions by observing conspecifics as they choose their mates and then copying this witnessed decision. When the copier, however, is detected by the choosing individual, the latter often alters its behavior and spends more time with the previously non-preferred mate. This behavioral change is called the audience effect. The deception hypothesis states that the choosing individual changes its behavior to distract the audience from the preferred mate. The deception hypothesis, however, only applies if the audience indeed copies the pretended mate choice of the observed individual. So far, this necessary prerequisite has never been tested. We investigated in Atlantic molly males and females whether, first, focal fish show an audience effect, i.e., alter their mate choices in the presence of an audience fish, and second, whether audience fish copy the mate choice of the focal fish they had just witnessed. We found evidence that male and female Atlantic mollies copy the pretended mate choice of same-sex focal fish. Therefore, a necessary requirement of the deception hypothesis is fulfilled. Our results show that public information use in the context of mate choice can be costly.

Highlights

  • The evolution of mate choice is one of the most fascinating topics in biology

  • Our aim is to test whether male and female Atlantic mollies (1) show an audience effect, by altering their initial mate-choice decision when a same sex audience is present, and (2) whether the audience fish that had just witnessed the mate choice of the focal fish copied that mate-choice decision

  • We found a trend for treatment (LM: df = 1, F = 3.096, p = 0.08) and a significant interaction between type of fish and sex (LM: df = 1, F = 6.387, p = 0.012)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

1871 [1] proposed that females choose mates and are, the driving force of extravagant secondary sexual traits in males, the debate on how individuals choose mates and what kind of intrinsic and extrinsic factors shape these preferences is still relevant. Most models in sexual selection assume that males and females exhibit genetically based mate preferences [2,3,4,5,6], it is widely accepted that the environment and, non-genetic factors can shape mate choice as well. Mate-choice decisions can be altered by ecological factors [7,8,9], maternal effects [10] and by the social environment [11,12,13,14,15]. In the context of mate choice, public information can be used to find and choose potential partners, to detect fertile females [19], to evaluate the quality of mating partners [11], or to assess conspecifics as potential rivals in mate choice [20,21]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.