Abstract

The study aimed to equate two test forms using the linear equating method and estimate the amount of equating errors associated with the method. The linear equating method was used to adjust for the difficulties of the test Form A and Form B on students’ Mathematics test scores. A 20-item mathematics instrument was used for data collection. The bootstrap method was used in the determination of the amount of equating errors that come with this equating method. Data on participants’ test scores on these two congeneric parallel test forms were used for this study. All the requirements for equating the two test forms were met with a reliability coefficient of .71. The scores of a new Form B of the test were then equated to its referenced Form A using a linear equating method. Findings from the study revealed that the linear equating method produced scores that were beyond the required possible observed scores, especially at the lower end of the scores. Again, the amount of error associated with the linear equating method seems to decrease consistently from the low ability scores to the high ability scores.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.