Abstract

As HIV testing increases worldwide, programs are reaching individuals without HIV infection who are at risk of exposure and may be candidates for oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). Although linkage of individuals with HIV infection to treatment is a global priority (referred to as "test and treat"), less attention is given to individuals with negative HIV test results. We developed the "Test and Prevent" pilot program to intentionally link at-risk clients with negative HIV test results to PrEP services. The intervention included risk assessment of all clients with a negative result from HIV testing (with national risk assessment tool), accompanied referral, fast-tracking, and targeting follow-up. The intervention was conducted in Bulawayo, Zimbabwe, at 6 public sector sites from October 2019 to February 2020. We collected routine monitoring data from all study sites and tracked referral completion and PrEP initiation among clients who enrolled. We conducted in-depth interviews with providers (n=12), facility managers (n=5), and female clients (n=17) to explore acceptability. Among clients referred for PrEP (n=206), 98% completed their referrals and started PrEP. However, only 3% of clients who received a negative test result during the study period were referred. Low referrals stemmed from lack of screening (39% of clients with negative HIV test results were not screened) and lack of eligibility among clients who were screened (only 6% of those screened qualified as candidates for PrEP per the national screening tool). Qualitative results indicate that some providers purposefully did not complete screening with clients they felt were not at risk and that workload could have contributed to low screening uptake.Qualitative interviews showed that Test and Prevent was acceptable among both providers and clients. Clients were happy to learn about PrEP following HIV testing, and the additional support of accompanied referrals and fast-tracking encouraged them to access PrEP and made them feel valued. Providers were burdened by workload constraints but felt that Test and Prevent was important and should be scaled to other sites. Intentionally linking clients with negative results to PrEP immediately following HIV testing was found to be acceptable from both provider and client perspectives, yet screening procedures need closer examination and reinforcement for the program to realize a larger impact.

Highlights

  • Provision of antiretroviral therapy (ART) as treatment for HIV has increased markedly in the past 15 years

  • Sites barriers exist for were purposely selected based on availability of women accessing pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) services and client volume for HIV testing. prevention we originally intended that the inter- services, so the vention be delivered approximately 2 months af- more timeter PrEP was first introduced to these facilities, consuming delays in the PrEP supply chain resulted in PrEP accompanied and the intervention being rolled out simulta- referrals and fastneously

  • 61% of the individuals with negative results were screened for HIV risk using the Risk Assessment Screening Tool (RAST), and of these, only 6% were deemed at risk of HIV, and invited to enroll in the study

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Provision of antiretroviral therapy (ART) as treatment for HIV has increased markedly in the past 15 years. Organization (WHO) estimated that 59% of people living with HIV (PLHIV) globally were on ART, an increase from just 7% in 2005.1,2 One important strategy for initiating more PLHIV on ART is “test and treat,” which recommends that treatment start immediately following HIV diagnosis.[1]. As these approaches to HIV treatment scale up and programs prioritize intensified HIV testing, The goal of the greater numbers of high-risk clients with negative current evaluation test results who may be good candidates for prewas to assess the vention services are being identified. Conclusion: Intentionally linking clients with negative results to PrEP immediately following HIV testing was found to be acceptable from both provider and client perspectives, yet screening procedures need closer examination and reinforcement for the program to realize a larger impact

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call