Abstract

The Thesis of Theory-Laden [TTL] holds that is not possible a neutral observation. From this thesis, some philosophers have inferred that the facts, i.e., the subject’s independent reality, do not exist or that they are social constructions only. The aim of this paper is assess if TTL necessarily implies a constructivist point of view or if, conversely, we can still speak about the reality. In order to do this, we will clarify these terms: “the theoryladenness of observation” and “constructivism”. Then, we will argue that although TTL is possible, we are not committed to constructivism, and on the contrary, TTL can be an interesting frame to the realistic thesis. Finally, we will point out the impact this had has when evaluating many epistemological proposals.

Highlights

  • La tesis de la carga teórica de la observación [CTO] sostiene que no es posible una observación neutral

  • some philosophers have inferred that the facts

  • assess if TTL necessarily implies a constructivist point of view

Read more

Summary

Introduction

La tesis de la carga teórica de la observación [CTO] sostiene que no es posible una observación neutral. Se señalarán dos objeciones a la doctrina de la carga teórica de la observación: el mecanismo de percepción “modular” de Fodor (1984) y la teoría del ver no-conceptual de los objetos expuesta por Dretske, pero para la presente exposición nos remitimos a la reconstrucción que de ella hace Nola (2003).

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call