Abstract
The term tertiary succession which follows restoration measures was introduced recently as a complement to primary and secondary succession. However, its widespread use is not justified ecologically. It seems rather formalistic and does not contribute to a better linking of successional theory and practical ecological restoration. The arguments questioning the use of this term are summarized here.
Full Text 
Sign-in/Register to access full text options
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Published version (
Free)
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
