Territory size in the moorhen ( Gallinula chloropus): An outcome of RHP asymmetry between neighbours

Abstract

Territory size can be considered as the outcome of contests between an owner and its neighbours for the resource units in the defended area. Variation in territory size could be dependent upon three possible asymmetries: (1) difference in resource holding potential (RHP); (2) difference in resource value to the competitors; and (3) difference in ‘ownership’ status. These possibilities were tested in a 3-year study of moorhens which defend linear territories along ditches in a grazing marsh habitat. Of the three, relative difference in RHP between an owner and its two neighbours provided the best correlation with territory size. There was no relationship between the amount of resources per unit area and territory size nor between the time of establishing a territory and its later size. Heavier moorhens are more likely to win contests in winter flocks and are thought to have a greater RHP. The ratio of the weight of a male territory owner to the weight of both its male neighbours was highly correlated with territory size. Birds with larger territories may gain more potential nesting sites with good cover from predators.