Abstract
The ongoing interest in the effects of territoriality on conflict among states makes it necessary to integrate and examine the existing claims on this topic and to apply them to the empirical data on crisis, conflict, and war. The early literature on territoriality has presented a unidimensional model explaining the occurrence of war. Its major claim accords well with common sense: the more salient the territorial conflict between states, the more likely is the outbreak of war between them. Conventional wisdom and the existing literature about territoriality and violence suggest a simple cause-effect relationship between these two variables (see, for example, Most and Starr 1980; Diehl 1985, 1991, 1992; Diehl and Goertz 1988; Thompson 1990; O'Loughlin and Anselin 1991; Starr 1991; Goertz and Diehl 1992; Ruggie 1993; Gleditsch 1995; Kocs 1995; Gray 1996).' Yet, the concept of territoriality has not always been clearly defined. Nor has it been consistently operationalized or tested across a large number of cases. Furthermore, most empirical data relate to war situations but not to the complex escalation patterns that unfold in the course of an international confrontation and do not always end with full-scale war.2 The fact that neighbors confront one another, and sometimes even fight, does not automatically validate the link between territoriality and conflict. To determine if such a relationship exists, one must compare nonwar with war situations and explore several dimensions of territoriality in these diverse situations. Such an analysis is the purpose of this essay. So, how important is territoriality in explaining international conflict? This is the major research question explored in this essay. More specifically, it will focus on the extent to which territory is a driving force in the outbreak of crises, violence, and even war. The argument is made that the role of territory has not yet been fully examined. It does appear to have a causal effect on violence, but a comprehensive theory of territoriality and war has yet to be established. Stated differently, territoriality may be, in part, an extension of the power context for interstate rivalry and the outbreak of hostilities. For the weaker states in the system, it is a major constraint, but this does not always make territory a necessary or sufficient condition for violence or war. In order to devise a theory of territoriality, the nature of the impact that territory has on war must be explained. Political scientists need to investigate what it is in territoriality that triggers interstate conflict, crisis, and war. The goals of this essay are geared to meeting this challenge by formulating three
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.