Abstract

AbstractNowadays, the circularity concept dominates the debate on resource management in cities and territories. The idea is often used as a vehicle towards a more sustainable socio-ecological transition, based on the circular economy (CE) framework. Unlike other sustainability frameworks, CE originates in ecological and environmental economics and industrial ecology. It focuses on developing an alternative economic and technological model for production and consumption, avoiding natural resource depletion and redesigning processes and cycles of materials (closed-loops). However, when CE is translated to cities and territories, its environmental, economic and design agency is often neglected. On the one hand, it demands to acknowledge the need for a relational understanding of space, place and actors involved and, on the other, to explore the spatial specificity of CE. Therefore, there is a need for a broader theoretical discourse on the CE’s territoriality as the predominant. Research on circular urban and territorial development demands more than merely upscaling industrial ecosystems diagrams and generating circular businesses. Consequently, what is the role of territory in the CE conceptualisation in the urbanism literature? How to interpret territories through the lens of circularity, which tools, methods are needed? Therefore, territory, its role and meaning in the CE contribution to urban regeneration is the key focus of this text.

Highlights

  • Global economic growth, urbanisation processes and the depletion of natural resources are interrelated systems

  • Urbanisation processes and the depletion of natural resources are interrelated systems. Their relationship is grounded by a linear growth model, which transforms resources into waste by reducing values from natural resources and environments (EMF, 2013; van der Leer et al, 2018)

  • It focuses on the Amsterdam Metropolitan Area (AMA)[1] case study, and it makes use of the tool of ‘resource cartographies’, a notion that juxtaposes the status quo of flows and stock of a specific flow, namely wood waste, with the territory’s ecological and morphological features

Read more

Summary

Chapter 2

The circularity concept dominates the debate on resource management in cities and territories. CE originates in ecological and environmental economics and industrial ecology. It focuses on developing an alternative economic and technological model for production and consumption, avoiding natural resource depletion and redesigning processes and cycles of materials (closed-loops). When CE is translated to cities and territories, its environmental, economic and design agency is often neglected. Research on circular urban and territorial development demands more than merely upscaling industrial ecosystems diagrams and generating circular businesses. What is the role of territory in the CE conceptualisation in the urbanism literature?. How to interpret territories through the lens of circularity, which tools, methods are needed?. Territory, its role and meaning in the CE contribution to urban regeneration is the key focus of this text

Introduction
Framing the Territorial Dimension in the CE Debate
15 Infrastructure for China’s Ecologically Balanced Civilization
23 Securing a port’s future
29 Urban landscape design
The Necessity of Representation
Resource Cartographies
Mapping the Flow
Justaxposing Flow and Infrastructural Network
Unfolding Stock and Flow Relationship
A Circular Stock and Flow Relationship
Reflection and Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call