Abstract

Energy poverty is a crucial concept in current global energy policy, both for the importance of securing equitable access to high-quality energy services to all human populations and to advance toward a just energy transition to a decarbonized economy. Nonetheless, one of the limitations of this concept due to its focus at the household scale, it has tended to omit relevant energy conditions at a territorial scale, which can also be a dimension of significant deprivation (e.g., transportation, schools, hospitals, public services, industrial uses among others.). On the other hand, energy services are highly dependent on context: on the geographic, ecological, technical, economic, and sociocultural conditions. This context-dependency determines the range of energy and technological alternatives available in a territory. Hence, a conceptual framework is required to better understand the starting point to a just energy transition, capable of integrating the complexity of socio-techno-ecological systems. To fill this gap, we present a framework based on the concept of Territorial Energy Vulnerability (TEV), defined as the propensity of a territory to not guarantee equitable access—in quantity and quality—to resilient energy services that allow the sustainable human and economic development of its population. That is a greater probability of inequity in access to energy services or a significant impacts derived from socio-natural risks that make it incapable of guaranteeing a sustainable and resilient provision of these services. Built on state-of-the-art conceptualizations of risk, we develop an indicator-based framework on vulnerability understood as the combination of sensitivity and resilience characteristics of socio-techno-ecological systems. Sensitivity relates to economic, demographic, infrastructure, technology, culture, and knowledge characteristics of socio-techno-ecological components. Meanwhile, resilience is presented in a three-dimensional framework based on flexibility, register, and self-transformation capacity of socio-techno-ecological systems. An application of this framework is developed using three case studies: Arica, Los Andes and Coyhaique, all Chilean cities with diverse ecological, technical, economic, and sociocultural conditions that shape territorial vulnerability. Using this framework as a diagnostic tool, the development of a just energy transition could adapt existing concepts of energy poverty and decarbonization pathways into context-specific guidelines and policies.

Highlights

  • Ensuring access to affordable, reliable, and sustainable energy for all is a crucial pillar of sustainable development (United Nations, 2015), supporting as much economic development as the satisfaction of a large variety of human needs (Bhatia and Angelou, 2015; Thomson et al, 2017; Nadimi and Tokimatsu, 2018; Robicand Ancic, 2018)

  • This paper aims to outline an analytical framework to examine what we call “territorial energy vulnerability” (TEV in the following), understood as the propensity of a territory to see its ability to ensure high-quality energy services affected by hazards or dangers such as climate change or socio-natural disasters

  • We offer a description of sensitivity characteristics of Arica, Los Andes, and Coyhaique that impact present and, probably, future conditions of energy access and could become barriers to just energy transition policies

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Reliable, and sustainable energy for all is a crucial pillar of sustainable development (United Nations, 2015), supporting as much economic development as the satisfaction of a large variety of human needs (Bhatia and Angelou, 2015; Thomson et al, 2017; Nadimi and Tokimatsu, 2018; Robicand Ancic, 2018). The need to simultaneously ensure a secure energy provision, advance toward a more environmentally benign energy matrix, and reduce energy poverty, is known as the energy trilemma, a key challenge for advancing toward sustainable energy development (International Energy Agency, 2018; World Energy Council, 2019) Facing this trilemma requires devising strategies for a just energy transition (McCauley and Heffron, 2018), which complies with climate goals while ensuring energy justice. Cities can act as frontrunners and sites of innovative climate action and governance (van der Heijden, 2019) This fact urges the development of an integrated approach to design climatesensitive urban governance, i.e., able to enact mitigative, adaptive, and transformative efforts in the face of a changing planet (Brondizio et al, 2016; Bai, 2018), while fostering justice and equality. Up to this point, urban governance remains a strongly fragmented field targeted by a variety of epistemic communities encompassing urban planning, disaster management, and climate vulnerability, to quote just a few (Wolfram et al, 2017)

Objectives
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call