Abstract

Removal or loss of top-predators has been predicted to cause cascading negative effects for ecosystems, including mesopredator release. However, reliable evidence for these processes in terrestrial systems has been mixed and equivocal due, in large part, to the systemic and continued use of low-inference study designs to investigate this issue. Even previous large-scale manipulative experiments of strong inferential value have been limited by experimental design features (i.e. failure to prevent migration between treatments) that constrain possible inferences about the presence or absence of mesopredator release effects. Here, we build on these previous strong-inference experiments and report the outcomes of additional large-scale manipulative experiments to eradicate Australian dingoes from two fenced areas where dingo migration was restricted and where theory would predict an increase in extant European red foxes, feral cats and goannas. We demonstrate the removal and suppression of dingoes to undetectable levels over 4–5 years with no corresponding increases in mesopredator relative abundances, which remained low and stable throughout the experiment at both sites. We further demonstrate widespread absence of negative relationships between predators, indicating that the mechanism underpinning predicted mesopredator releases was not present. Our results are consistent with all previous large-scale manipulative experiments and long-term mensurative studies which collectively demonstrate that (1) dingoes do not suppress red foxes, feral cats or goannas at the population level, (2) repeated, temporary suppression of dingoes in open systems does not create mesopredator release effects, and (3) removal and sustained suppression of dingoes to undetectable levels in closed systems does not create mesopredator release effects either. Our experiments add to similar reports from North America, Asia, Europe and southern Africa which indicate that not only is there a widespread absence of reliable evidence for these processes, but there is also a large and continually growing body of experimental evidence of absence for these processes in many terrestrial systems. We conclude that although sympatric predators may interact negatively with each other on smaller spatiotemporal scales, that these negative interactions do not always scale-up to the population level, nor are they always strong enough to create mesopredator suppression or release effects.

Highlights

  • Removal or loss of top-predators has been predicted to cause cascading negative effects for ecosystems, including mesopredator release

  • We found no other differences in overall mean passive tracking indices (PTI) for any predator species at either site (Table 2, Fig. 1)

  • Australia holds the embarrassing title for the country with the most mammal extinctions in modern history, and many more threatened fauna species are predicted to become extinct over the few d­ ecades[111,112]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Removal or loss of top-predators has been predicted to cause cascading negative effects for ecosystems, including mesopredator release. Evidence for dingoes killing foxes, cats, and goannas has been largely inferred from the presence of their remains in dingo scat and stomach s­ amples[31,32,33,34], but has been directly observed in some ­cases[35] Their broadly overlapping distributions and diet suggests that dingoes may suppress mesopredators through indirect competition for shared prey ­resources[10,11,33], though others have pointed out that this means all three predators eat the same things and threaten the same s­ pecies[36]. Frequent drought conditions produce frequent prey shortages which should enhance the suppressive effects of dingoes on mesopredators in these a­ reas[42,43]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call