Abstract

In west-central British Columbia, terrestrial lichens located in older, lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta) forests are important winter forage for woodland caribou (Rangifer tarandus caribou). Clearcut harvesting effectively removes winter forage habitat for decades, so management approaches based on partial cutting were designed to maintain continuous lichen-bearing habitat for caribou. This study tested a group selection system, based on removal of 33% of the forest every 80 years in small openings (15 m diameter), and two irregular shelterwood treatments (whole-tree and stem-only harvesting methods) where 50% of the stand area is cut every 70 years in 20 to 30 m diameter openings. The abundance of common terrestrial lichens among the partial cutting and no-harvest treatments was compared across five replicate blocks, pre-harvest (1995) and post-harvest (1998, 2000 and 2004). The initial loss of preferred forage lichens (Cladonia, Cladina, Cetraria and Stereocaulon) was similar among harvesting treatments, but there was greater reduction in these lichens in the openings than in the residual forest. After eight years, forage lichens in the group selection treatment recovered to pre-harvest amounts, while lichen in the shelterwood treatments steadily increased from 49 to 57% in 1998 to about 70% of pre-harvest amounts in 2004. Although not part of the randomized block design, there was substantially less lichen in three adjacent clearcut blocks than in the partial cuts. Regression analysis pre- and post-harvest indicated that increased cover of trees, shrubs, herbs, woody debris and logging slash corresponded with decreased forage lichen abundance. In the short-term, forestry activities that minimize inputs of woody debris, control herb and shrub development, and moderate the changes in light and temperatures associated with canopy removal will lessen the impact on lichen. Implementation of stand level prescriptions is only one aspect of caribou habitat management. A comprehensive approach should consider all factors and their interactions to maintain a viable population of woodland caribou in west-central British Columbia.

Highlights

  • Committee on the Status of Endangered WildlifeThe northern woodland caribou ecotype (Rangifer in Canada (COSEWIC) and qualifies for protection tarandus caribou) (Heard & Vagt, 1998) in the Chilco- and recovery under the Canadian Species at Risk Act tin region of west-central British Columbia (B.C.) (SARA).is estimated at 2175 animals (Youds et al, 2002).The historic range of northern caribou in theThis population is designated as 'Threatened' by the Central Interior has become increasingly restrictedRangifer, Special Issue No 19, 2011 due to past forest development, access issues, private land ownership and other development (Youds et al, 2002)

  • In west-central British Columbia, terrestrial lichens located in older, lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta) forests are important winter forage for woodland caribou (Rangifer tarandus caribou)

  • In west-central B.C., fecal fragment analysis indicated that both terrestrial and arboreal lichens are important forage during winter, comprising 68% of the caribou's diet and occurring in about equal proportions (Cichowski, 1989), field obser¬ vations indicated that terrestrial lichens are preferred

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Committee on the Status of Endangered WildlifeThe northern woodland caribou ecotype (Rangifer in Canada (COSEWIC) and qualifies for protection tarandus caribou) (Heard & Vagt, 1998) in the Chilco- and recovery under the Canadian Species at Risk Act tin region of west-central British Columbia (B.C.) (SARA).is estimated at 2175 animals (Youds et al, 2002).The historic range of northern caribou in theThis population is designated as 'Threatened' by the Central Interior has become increasingly restrictedRangifer, Special Issue No 19, 2011 due to past forest development, access issues, private land ownership and other development (Youds et al, 2002). The historic range of northern caribou in the This population is designated as 'Threatened' by the Central Interior has become increasingly restricted. In order to manage development, the Northern Cari¬ bou Strategy component of the Cariboo-Chilcotin Land Use Plan (CCLUP) (Youds et al, 2002) deline¬ ated the current caribou range (about 1.5 million hectares) into no-forest-harvesting areas and parks (31%), conventional clearcut forest harvesting areas (52%), conventional clearcuts within a natural seral distribution zone (4%), and "modified" (partial cut) harvest areas (13%). A key habitat component affected by forest har¬ vesting is lichen, which is the major winter forage of woodland caribou throughout their range (Edwards et al, 1960; Scotter, 1967; Ahti & Hepburn, 1967). In west-central B.C., fecal fragment analysis indicated that both terrestrial and arboreal lichens are important forage during winter, comprising 68% of the caribou's diet and occurring in about equal proportions (Cichowski, 1989), field obser¬ vations indicated that terrestrial lichens are preferred

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call